- 7 - request, pursuant to section 301.9100-3, Proced. & Admin. Regs., for an extension of time to make the election, and (2) respondent improperly denied that request. B. Respondent’s Argument Respondent argues that petitioner’s brief foray into high- volume, short-term securities trading, during 1999, was of insufficient duration to enable him to qualify as a “trader in securities” for purposes of section 475(f)(1). Respondent further argues that, even if petitioner qualified as a trader in securities as of January 1, 1999, he failed to make an effective mark-to-market election under section 475(f) and Rev. Proc. 99-17, 1999-1 C.B. 503, pursuant to which an election effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1999, should have been filed “not later than the due date (without regard to extensions) of the original * * * return for the taxable year immediately preceding the election year”, or, in this case, by April 15, 1999, the due date of petitioner’s 1998 return. See Rev. Proc. 99-17, 1999-1 C.B. at 504. Lastly, respondent argues that petitioner “never made a request for an extension of time to make the [section 475(f)] election.”Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011