Wanda P. Chocallo - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Petitioner requests that respondent’s employees who handled her             
          case be criminally prosecuted for various alleged offenses.  We             
          have no jurisdiction to consider such actions.  Petitioner also             
          claims other monetary compensation including damages in the sum             
          of $1 million for alleged wrongs committed by respondent’s                  
          employees.  Petitioner does not cite or rely upon any specific              
          statute as a basis for these claims, and we generally have no               
          jurisdiction over such matters.8  If petitioner’s $1 million                
          claim for damages were meant to be predicated upon section 7433,            
          which provides for up to $1 million in civil damages for certain            
          unauthorized collection actions, we note that such claims must be           
          brought in a district court of the United States.                           
               Since petitioner has received all the relief to which she is           
          entitled under section 6330, we shall grant respondent’s motion             
          to dismiss this case as moot.  We shall also deny petitioner’s              











               8Petitioner has not explicitly claimed administrative or               
          litigation costs pursuant to sec. 7430 even though she was                  
          specifically advised by the Court that if she wished to make such           
          claim she would have to provide the facts and information                   
          required by Rule 231.  Petitioner has not provided the                      
          information required by Rule 231.                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011