Louise Coleman, Petitioner, Fred L. Nubin, Intervenor - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent issued to petitioner a Final Notice determining             
          that petitioner was not entitled to allocate the deficiencies for           
          1989 and 1990 under section 6015(c).  Petitioner timely filed her           
          Petition, and then Fred L. Nubin (intervenor) filed a Notice Of             
          Intervention.  After a concession by respondent that petitioner             
          is entitled to relief from joint and several liability under                
          section 6015(c), this Court must decide whether respondent erred            
          in granting relief to petitioner under section 6015(c).                     
               Most of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are            
          so found.  Petitioner resided in Los Angeles, California, at the            
          time she filed her petition.  Intervenor resided in Thomaston,              
          Georgia, at the time of the filing of the Notice of Intervention.           
               On March 19, 1976, petitioner and intervenor were married.             
          Petitioner was 34 years old, and intervenor was 50 years old at             
          the time of their marriage.  In 1978, a daughter was born to                
          petitioner and intervenor.                                                  
               Intervenor started the business activity, Fred Nubin                   
          Building Maintenance, prior to the marriage.  The business                  
          provided janitorial services.  During their marriage, intervenor            
          operated the business.                                                      
               During the 1989 and 1990 taxable years in issue, petitioner            
          and intervenor were married and living together.  During 1989 and           
          1990, petitioner was not employed on a full-time basis.                     
          Petitioner and intervenor’s divorce was made final on March 3,              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011