Renee Trupin D'Aunay - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          6015(d)(3)(A), generally, any items that give rise to a                     
          deficiency on a joint return shall be allocated to the individual           
          filing the return in the same manner as they would have been                
          allocated if the individual had filed a separate return for the             
          taxable year.                                                               
               Under section 6015(c)(4)(A), the portion of the deficiency             
          for which the electing spouse is liable is increased by the value           
          of any disqualified asset transferred to the taxpayer.  The term            
          “disqualified asset” means any property or right to property                
          transferred to the taxpayer making the election under section               
          6015(c) by the other individual filing the joint return if the              
          principal purpose of the transfer was the avoidance of tax or               
          payment of tax.  Sec. 6015(c)(4)(B)(i).                                     
               Under section 6015(c)(4)(B)(ii), there is a presumption that           
          any asset transfer that occurs after the date that is 1 year                
          before the first letter of proposed deficiency is sent by the IRS           
          has as its principal purpose the avoidance of tax or payment of             
          tax.                                                                        
               In respondent’s posttrial brief, respondent concedes that              
          the entire deficiencies for 1984 through 1986 are allocable to              
          Trupin under section 6015(d)(3)(A).  In addition, respondent                
          concedes that $881,103 and $985,314 are allocable to Trupin in              
          1982 and 1983, respectively.  Respondent contends, however, and             
          we agree, that the disallowed losses from petitioner’s investment           






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011