- 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax of $1,991 for the taxable year 2000. The issue remaining for decision is whether Social Security disability benefits petitioners received are includable in their gross income.1 Petitioners resided in Chula Vista, California, on the date the petition was filed in this case. Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for taxable year 2000. They did not report any income from Social Security disability benefits. Respondent determined that petitioners received $15,053 in disability benefits during 2000, and that $12,795 of this amount was includable in petitioners’ gross income. Petitioners do not dispute receiving the amount of benefits respondent determined. Rather, petitioners argue that disability benefits, as such, should not be included in gross income. Petitioners base their position upon advice they received from an accountant and IRS employees, who told petitioners that disability payments are not taxable. However, despite the advice 1The Court, in an order dated Dec. 1, 2003, held that a notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for taxable year 1999 was invalid because it did not reflect petitioners’ last known address. Because the jurisdiction of this Court requires a valid notice of deficiency, petitioners’ case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction insofar as it related to 1999, and this Court may not address at this time issues raised by petitioners with respect to that year. Petitioners do not dispute the only other adjustment in the notice of deficiency for taxable year 2000, the inclusion in income of capital gain dividends of $15.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011