Joseph A. and Carol DelVecchio - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
          sustained the proposed levy, found the assessment legally                   
          supported and timely made, and denied Carol DelVecchio’s request            
          for relief from joint liability.                                            
               The petition followed.                                                 
                                     Discussion                                       
               Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and                
          avoid unnecessary and expensive trials.  Fla. Peach Corp. v.                
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988).  Summary judgment may be             
          granted with respect to all or any part of the legal issues in              
          controversy “if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories,                  
          depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials,                
          together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no                 
          genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be            
          rendered as a matter of law.”  Rule 121(a) and (b); Sundstrand              
          Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965           
          (7th Cir. 1994).                                                            
               The moving party bears the burden of proving that there is             
          no genuine issue of material fact, and factual inferences are               
          drawn in a manner most favorable to the party opposing summary              
          judgment.  Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985);              
          Jacklin v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 340, 344 (1982).4  In responding           


               4 Petitioners urge respondent’s motion for summary judgment            
          must be denied because the parties have not entered into any                
          stipulations.  The Court disagrees.  Rule 121 does not require              
          stipulations as a prerequisite to the granting of a motion for              
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011