Dina DeSalvo - Page 11

                                       - 10 -                                         
               Giving petitioner the benefit of the doubt, this Court finds           
          that petitioner’s argument in her petition calls into question              
          the issue of her underlying liability for the deficiencies                  
          assessed as to taxable years 1993 and 1994.  However, the record            
          shows that both parties agreed to the deficiencies and petitioner           
          executed a Form 870, Waiver of Restriction on Assessment and                
          Collection of Deficiency of Tax, for taxable years 1993 and 1994.           
          Therefore, by signing the Form 870, petitioner consented to the             
          assessment and collection of the deficiencies and interest for              
          1993 and 1994 and waived the opportunity to petition the Court to           
          redetermine the deficiencies.  Aguirre v. Commissioner, 117 T.C.            
          324 (2001); Rivera v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-35, affd. 102           
          Fed. Appx. 595 (9th Cir. 2004).                                             
               Petitioner failed to pay the amount of tax shown on her 2000           
          Federal income tax return.  Once again, giving petitioner the               
          benefit of the doubt, this Court finds that petitioner’s argument           
          in her petition calls into question the issue of her underlying             
          liability for the unpaid amount and addition to tax for the                 
          taxable year 2000.  As discussed above, under section 6330(c),              
          the validity of the underlying tax liability may be raised at the           
          CDP hearing only if the taxpayer “did not receive any statutory             
          notice of deficiency for such tax liability or did not otherwise            
          have an opportunity to dispute such tax liability.”  Sec.                   
          6330(c)(2)(B); see Tornichio v. United States, 263 F. Supp. 2d              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011