Charles Deverna - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          were sent to Brown and his wife.  Between January 3 and                     
          November 24, 1997, Brown signed the revised closing agreements              
          and returned them to District Counsel’s office.  The agreements             
          had to be signed by Manhattan Appeals, however, and not by                  
          District Counsel.  The closing agreements were countersigned by             
          Manhattan Appeals and then returned to District Counsel’s office.           
               On November 24, 1997, after District Counsel’s office                  
          received the signed closing agreements from Manhattan Appeals,              
          the Manhattan Associates decision document was sent to the Tax              
          Court.  On December 2, 1997, a decision was entered in the                  
          Manhattan Associates case by the Court under Rule 248(a) for 1982           
          through 1984.  On March 2, 1998, the decision became final under            
          section 7481.  The Manhattan Associates case was sent to                    
          Manhattan Appeals for closing and assessment.  The case was sent            
          to the controlling IRS service center for the Swanton coal                  
          programs for processing and forwarded to the TEFRA unit of the              
          IRS service center where the taxpayers filed their returns so               
          that the taxpayers could be assessed.                                       
               On September 9, 1998, Forms 4549-A, Income Tax Examination             
          Changes, were sent to petitioner for 1984.  On October 13, 1998,            
          Forms 4549-A were sent to petitioner for 1982.  On October 29,              
          1998, Forms 4549-A were sent to petitioner for 1983.                        
               As a result of the changes to petitioner’s account due to              
          the Manhattan Associates TEFRA proceedings, the IRS assessed                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011