- 3 - wit: The release of the Notice of Federal Tax Lien because it was causing petitioner a significant hardship. The representative proposed that if respondent released the Notice of Federal Tax Lien, respondent could record a new notice if petitioner defaulted with respect to the payments under the installment agreement. On December 17, 2002, the Appeals officer engaged in a telephonic conference with petitioner and his representative. Petitioner’s representative agreed that the administrative requisites had been followed or met by respondent. Petitioner’s representative also explained that petitioner was attempting to refinance property and that respondent should release the Notice of Federal Tax Lien because an installment payment agreement had been entered into with petitioner. The Appeals Office advised that a notice of lien is not released until the liability is satisfied or becomes uncollectible as a matter of law. Following the telephone conference with petitioner and his representative, the Appeals officer, on February 20, 2003, issued a notice of determination. In the accompanying writeup, the Appeals officer explained that the Notice of Federal Tax Lien would not be released and that the notice was not released as a matter of right if a taxpayer entered into an installment agreement. Petitioner resided in Jupiter, Florida, when he timely filed his petition with this Court.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011