Dover Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          III.  Summary of the Parties’ Arguments                                     
               A.  Petitioner’s Argument                                              
               Petitioner argues that, by permitting a corporate taxpayer             
          to “disregard” the separate entity status of a subsidiary and,              
          instead, treat the subsidiary’s business as a hypothetical branch           
          or division of the parent, the check-the-box regulations override           
          the principle, based upon Moline Props., Inc. v. Commissioner,              
          319 U.S. 436, 438-439 (1943), that the separate entity status of            
          a corporation may not be ignored for Federal tax purposes.  As a            
          result (as petitioner sees it), Dover UK is deemed not only to              
          sell H&C’s assets (rather than its shares in H&C) but is deemed             
          to be engaged in H&C’s business at the time of that sale.                   
          Therefore, petitioner argues that the H&C assets are excluded, by           
          section 1.954-2(e)(3)(ii) through (iv), Income Tax Regs., from              
          the definition of property “which does not give rise to any                 
          income”, with the result that the deemed sale of those assets did           
          not give rise to FPHCI pursuant to section 954(c)(1)(B)(iii).8              
               Alternatively, petitioner argues that, giving effect to the            
          “plain and ordinary meaning” of section 954(c)(1)(B)(iii), Dover            
          UK’s deemed sale of the operating assets of H&C “could not                  

               8  We find the parties to be in agreement that, whatever our           
          decision regarding the issue of whether Dover UK’s deemed sale of           
          the H&C operating assets constituted a sale of “property which              
          does not give rise to any income”, that decision applies to all             
          of H&C’s assets as of the date of the deemed asset sale to                  
          Thyssen.                                                                    





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011