Joseph Dutton - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          law applied to agreement to extend the period for making                    
          assessments).                                                               
               Mistake is defined in 1 Restatement, Contracts 2d, sec. 152            
          (1981), as follows:                                                         
                    (1) Where a mistake of both parties at the time a                 
               contract was made as to a basic assumption on which the                
               contract was made has a material effect on the agreed                  
               exchange of performances, the contract is voidable by                  
               the adversely affected party unless he bears the risk                  
               of the mistake under the rule stated in sec. 154.                      
                    (2) In determining whether the mistake has a                      
               material effect on the agreed exchange of performances,                
               account is taken of any relief by way of reformation,                  
               restitution, or otherwise.  [Emphasis supplied.]                       
          A mutual mistake exists where there has been a meeting of the               
          minds of the parties and an agreement actually entered into but             
          the agreement in its written form does not express the actual               
          intention of the parties.  Woods v. Commissioner, supra at 782.             
          A material fact is one “that is significant or essential to the             
          issue or matter at hand”.  Black’s Law Dictionary 611 (7th ed.              
          1999).                                                                      
               In Hopkins v. Commissioner, 120 T.C. 451, 462-463 (2003), we           
          held that a taxpayer was entitled to raise a claim for relief               
          under section 6015 where a closing agreement under section 7121             
          was signed before the effective date of section 6015, and the tax           
          liabilities assessed pursuant to the agreement remained unpaid as           
          of the effective date.  The instant case is distinguishable                 
          because it involves an offer in compromise under section 7122               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011