James P. Ellis - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to timely              
          file his 2000 return.                                                       
               In October 2003, over 6 months after respondent issued the             
          statutory notice of deficiency in this case, respondent mailed to           
          petitioner a letter advising of changes to petitioner's statement           
          of account for 1999 indicating that for 1999 "the amount you now            
          owe" is "none".                                                             
                                     Discussion                                       
          A.   Estoppel                                                               
               As a preliminary matter, petitioner contends that he does              
          not owe any tax for 1999 because he received a letter from the              
          IRS dated October 13, 2003, which stated that corrections had               
          been made to his 1999 tax account and "the amount you now owe" is           
          "none".                                                                     
               It appears that respondent erroneously assessed the amount             
          shown on the notice of deficiency for petitioner's 1999 taxable             
          year.  The letter respondent sent petitioner on October 13, 2003,           
          reversed that assessment because it had been made while                     
          petitioner's case was pending before this Court.  See sec.                  
          6213(a).                                                                    
               Petitioner alleges that he is no longer liable for the                 
          deficiency in tax and the section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax for            
          1999, claiming that respondent's October letter led him to                  
          believe that his case had been resolved:                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011