Ebrahim Elsawah - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax of $3,301 for the taxable year 2000.  The issue for              
          decision is whether petitioner is treated as not married under              
          section 7703(b), thereby entitling him to head-of-household                 
          filing status and an earned income credit.                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in El            
          Cajon, California, on the date the petition was filed in this               
          case.                                                                       
               Petitioner and his former wife, Laila M. Elsawah (Ms.                  
          Elsawah), received an Islamic divorce on April 2, 1999.1  The               
          following month, petitioner filed a petition for dissolution of             
          marriage with the Superior Court of San Diego County.  However,             
          this suit was abandoned, and no divorce was obtained as a result            
          thereof.  After receiving the Islamic divorce, Ms. Elsawah                  
          continued residing in the same residence as petitioner, a                   
          residence which they jointly owned.  Ms. Elsawah moved into the             
          basement while petitioner and their two children resided in the             
          upper levels.  Ms. Elsawah, who was working and who was involved            
          in another relationship, spent little time in the residence.  She           
          permanently left the residence in October 2001.  Throughout this            


          1This Court need not, and clearly cannot, rule upon the                     
          validity of such a religious divorce.  We accept petitioner’s               
          testimony that he received the divorce.                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011