Joseph F. and Caroline Enos - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
              In United States v. Natl. Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713                
         (1985), a nonbankruptcy case, the Supreme Court observed that an             
         “administrative levy, unlike a judicial lien-foreclosure action,             
         does not determine the ownership rights to the property.”  Id. at            
         731 (citing United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677, 696 (1983)).             
         Moreover, in Natl. Bank of Commerce, the Supreme Court held that             
         “The Court, in other words, recognized what we now make explicit:            
         that � 6331[7] is a provisional remedy, which does not determine             

               7Sec. 6331 provides:                                                   
               SEC. 6331.  LEVY AND DISTRAINT.                                        
                    (a)  Authority of Secretary.–If any person liable to              
               pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10              
               days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the               
               Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall           
               be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy               
               upon all property and rights to property (except such                  
               property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such            
               person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter            
               for the payment of such tax.  Levy may be made upon the                
               accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected           
               official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or           
               any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the              
               District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the               
               employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer,              
               employee, or elected official.  If the Secretary makes a               
               finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy,                
               notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be             
               made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay              
               such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without           
               regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.                  
                    (b)  Seizure and Sale of Property.–The term “levy” as             
               used in this title includes the power of distraint and                 
               seizure by any means.  Except as otherwise provided in                 
               subsection (e), a levy shall extend only to property                   
               possessed and obligations existing at the time thereof.  In            
               any case in which the Secretary may levy upon property or              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011