- 5 - case, this Court followed the analysis of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, the governing circuit, in McNamara v. Commissioner, 236 F.3d 410 (8th Cir. 2000), revg. and remanding Bot v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999- 256, Henner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-306, and McNamara v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-333, and held that there was no nexus between the rental payments at issue and the oral agreement between the taxpayers and their farm corporation under which the taxpayers were to materially participate in the corporation’s production of agricultural commodities. Discussion According to petitioners, the decision of this Court in Johnson v. Commissioner, supra, “dictates that Curtis and Mary Ettesvold do not owe the additional self-employment taxes that were assessed against them by the Internal Revenue Service.” Accordingly, they contend that they are to be treated as the “prevailing party”, pursuant to section 7430(c)(4)(E), on the ground their tax liability is “less than the ‘qualified offer’ that they offered to the Internal Revenue Service.” Petitioners further assert that they had exhausted their administrative remedies available within the Internal Revenue Service, that they had not unreasonablyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011