Charles G. and Elizabeth A. Fargo - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          1991.  We believe however, that if there is a remedy, it does not           
          lie in denying the Government the interest to which it is legally           
          entitled.                                                                   
               Petitioners also call our attention to the decision in                 
          Beagles v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-67, which indicates that           
          the Commissioner abated over 6 years’ worth of interest arising             
          out of a similar liability for the taxpayers in that case, which            
          also arose from the Swanton Coal Programs.  Petitioners argue               
          that this makes it inequitable for respondent to have denied                
          their offer in compromise, which sought only similar relief.                
               We are unpersuaded.  The Commissioner’s decision to grant              
          interest abatement to one Swanton participant would hardly                  
          suffice to show that he abused his discretion in denying                    
          another’s request for an offer in compromise.  Different factors            
          are relevant to each form of relief, and of course, different               
          taxpayers face different circumstances: in Beagles, the                     
          Commissioner may have abated interest at least in part because              
          the taxpayer became terminally ill during the collection process.           
          Id.                                                                         














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011