Peggy A. Farley - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               Section 6330(c) prescribes the matters that a person may               
          raise at an Appeals Office hearing.  Section 6330(c)(2)(A)                  
          provides that a person may raise collection issues such as                  
          spousal defenses, the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s                 
          intended collection action, and possible alternative means of               
          collection.  See Montgomery v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 1, 5                  
          (2004); Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 609 (2000); Goza v.             
          Commissioner, supra.  In addition, section 6330(c)(2)(B)                    
          establishes the circumstances under which a person may challenge            
          the existence or amount of his or her underlying tax liability.             
          Section 6330(c)(2)(B) provides:                                             
               (2).  Issues at hearing.--                                             
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    (B) Underlying Liability.-–The person may also                    
               raise at the hearing challenges to the existence or                    
               amount of the underlying tax liability for any tax                     
               period if the person did not receive any statutory                     
               notice of deficiency for such tax liability or did not                 
               otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such tax                      
               liability.                                                             
               In Montgomery v. Commissioner, supra, we were called upon to           
          decide the meaning of the term “underlying tax liability”.  In              
          that case we held that the amount the taxpayers reported due on             
          their tax return along with statutory interest and penalties                
          constituted the underlying tax liability.  As the taxpayers in              
          Montgomery did not receive a notice of deficiency, we had to                
          further decide, whether they “did not otherwise have an                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011