Virginia Ferguson, f.k.a. Virginia Del Bosque, and Estate of Armand J. Del Bosque, Deceased, Lori Del Bosque, Special Administrator, et al. - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
               Citing Livingston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-121,                
          petitioners contend that, as a result of the errors in                      
          respondent’s computations, the computations are so unreliable as            
          to negate any presumption of correctness.  Petitioners assert               
          that the facts in Livingston are “strikingly similar” to the                
          facts in these cases.  We disagree.                                         
               In Livingston, we first found the 1989 opening net worth of            
          zero suspect given that the taxpayer was self-employed in that              
          year.  Further, the Commissioner’s 1989 net worth computation did           
          not account for the wife’s income, which was available to fund              
          the taxpayers’ joint expenditures; the computation effectively              
          treated all asset purchases and other joint expenditures as being           
          financed solely by the husband’s unreported income.  As a result            
          of those errors, we held that the Commissioner’s 1989 net worth             
          computation was so unreliable as to negate any presumption of               
          correctness.                                                                
               The types of errors in the Commissioner’s 1989 net worth               
          computation in Livingston are not present in the case at hand.              
          Respondent’s net worth computations of unreported income reflect            
          the combined incomes of petitioners and their wives.  The opening           
          and closing net worths include joint and separate property, and             
          respondent’s computations of unreported income take into account            
          the wives’ separate income.                                                 








Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011