Chester Valentine Gacioch - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          rates set forth in section 1(h).  It has been held that,                    
          consistent with this statutory mandate, the Form 1040, Individual           
          Income Tax Return, and its schedules “ensure that capital gain              
          distributions are taxed.”  Torre v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          2001-218, affd. 52 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2002).                          
               Aside from petitioner’s bare assertions, nothing in the                
          record indicates that any amount of the distribution represents a           
          return of capital.  Rather, the record indicates that the                   
          distribution was a capital gain dividend.  On the yearend                   
          statement, Vanguard reported the $7,118.80 as “long-term gains”.            
          Vanguard multiplied petitioner’s 955.543 shares by long-term                
          capital gain cash of $7.45 to calculate the $7,118.80                       
          distribution.  Further, on the Form 1099-DIV, Vanguard reported             
          the $7,118.80 as a capital gain distribution, rather than as a              
          nontaxable distribution.  Significantly, subsequent to the                  
          distribution, petitioner’s total cost basis and the number of               
          shares owned remained unchanged.  Petitioner admitted these facts           
          during trial.                                                               
               Petitioner contends that the $15,097.58 decrease in his                
          account value, from $41,518.34 to $26,420.76, resulted in a                 
          “capital loss”.  He then alleges that $5,494 of the $7,118.80               
          distribution was a return of capital.  Realistically, the                   
          decrease in petitioner’s account value was due to the decrease in           
          share price from $43.45 per share on February 10, 2000, to $27.65           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011