John R. and Edith M. Garbini - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               The standard for determining whether an expense is                     
          deductible under section 162 or 212, and not subject to the                 
          limitations of section 183, requires a taxpayer to demonstrate              
          that the activity was carried on with the actual and honest                 
          objective of making a profit.  Dreicer v. Commissioner, 78 T.C.             
          642, 645 (1982), affd. without opinion 702 F.2d 1205 (D.C. Cir.             
          1983); sec. 1.183-2(a), Income Tax Regs.  Although a reasonable             
          expectation of profit is not required, the facts and                        
          circumstances must indicate that the taxpayer entered into the              
          activity, or continued the activity, with the actual and honest             
          objective of making a profit.  Dreicer v. Commissioner, supra at            
          645.  The taxpayer’s objective to make a profit must be analyzed            
          by looking at all the surrounding facts.  Id.  These facts are              
          given greater weight than the taxpayer’s mere statement of                  
          intent.  Id.                                                                
               The regulations under section 183 provide a nonexclusive               
          list of relevant factors that should be considered in determining           
          whether the taxpayer has the requisite profit objective.  Sec.              
          1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.  The factors are:  (1) The manner in           
          which the taxpayer carries on the activity; (2) the expertise of            
          the taxpayer; (3) the time and effort expended by the taxpayer in           
          carrying on the activity; (4) the expectation that the assets               
          used in the activity may appreciate in value; (5) the success of            
          the taxpayer in carrying on other similar or dissimilar                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011