George N. Gerakios, a.k.a. Jorge N. Gerakios - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          penalties, and interest with respect to 1989, 1993, 1994, and               
          1996.  On or about August 30, 2002, respondent released the lien            
          against petitioner for 1989, 1993, 1994, and 1996.  Respondent no           
          longer intends to pursue any levy action against petitioner for             
          any income taxes, penalties, or interest for 1989, 1993, 1994,              
          and/or 1996 as they have been paid in full.                                 
               On November 4, 2003, respondent filed the motion.  On                  
          November 5, 2003, the Court ordered petitioner to file any                  
          objection to the motion on or before November 19, 2003.  On                 
          November 18, 2003, petitioner filed an objection to the motion.             
          The Court heard argument on the motion.                                     
          Discussion                                                                  
               Our jurisdiction under section 6330 is generally limited to            
          reviewing whether the proposed lien or levy action is proper.               
          Chocallo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-152.  Respondent                  
          released the lien and has stated that he is no longer pursuing              
          the proposed levy.  As the parties now agree that there is no               
          unpaid liability for 1989, 1993, 1994, or 1996 upon which a lien            
          or levy could be based, we agree with respondent that the case is           
          moot.  Id.                                                                  
               We note that petitioner claimed respondent’s employees                 
          mistreated him, respondent’s employees violated his civil rights,           
          and that his credit rating was adversely affected by the filing             
          of the lien.  Petitioner did not cite or rely on any specific               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011