James G. Gilligan - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520                  
          (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994).                                  
               We conclude that there is no genuine issue as to any                   
          material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of            
          law.                                                                        
               B.   Section 6330                                                      
               Section 6330 provides that the Secretary shall furnish the             
          person described in section 6331 with written notice (i.e., the             
          hearing notice) before a levy on any property or right to                   
          property.  Sec. 6330(a).  Section 6330 further provides that                
          within a 30-day period the taxpayer may request administrative              
          review of the matter (in the form of a hearing).  The hearing               
          generally shall be conducted consistent with the procedures set             
          forth in section 6330(b) and (c).                                           
               Pursuant to section 6330(c)(2)(A), a taxpayer may raise at             
          the section 6330 hearing any relevant issue with regard to the              
          Commissioner’s collection activities, including spousal defenses,           
          challenges to the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s intended            
          collection action, and alternative means of collection.  Sego v.            
          Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 609 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114           
          T.C. 176, 180 (2000).  If a taxpayer received a statutory notice            
          of deficiency for the years in issue or otherwise had the                   
          opportunity to dispute the underlying tax liability, the taxpayer           
          is precluded from challenging the existence or amount of the                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011