- 8 - As stated supra, the Court has sustained respondent’s determination that petitioner is not entitled to dependency exemption deductions for the children. Thus, petitioner fails the first prong of the test of section 24. The Court sustains respondent’s determination regarding the child tax credits under section 24. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011