Nasser and Shahpar Golshani - Page 12

                                       - 11 -                                         
          attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.6           
          Sec. 6662(a), (b)(1) and (2). “Negligence” is any failure to make           
          a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the                   
          internal revenue laws.  See sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1),              
          Income Tax Regs.  Moreover, negligence is the failure to exercise           
          due care or the failure to do what a reasonable and prudent                 
          person would do under the circumstances.  Neely v. Commissioner,            
          85 T.C. 934, 947 (1985).  “Disregard” includes any careless,                
          reckless, or intentional disregard of rules or regulations.  See            
          sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.                         
          Notwithstanding section 6662(a), no penalty will be imposed with            
          respect to any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that               
          there was “a reasonable cause for such portion and that the                 
          taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to such portion.”  Sec.           
          6664(c)(1).                                                                 
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for an               
          accuracy-related penalty attributable to negligence or disregard            
          of rules and regulations.                                                   
               On the basis of the record, we conclude that petitioners               
          made a reasonable attempt to comply with the Internal Revenue               


               6 Other types of underpayments that may give rise to the               
          imposition of an accuracy-related penalty under sec. 6662(a) and            
          (b) do not apply in this case.  Respondent did not present                  
          evidence that there was either a substantial or gross “valuation            
          misstatement” under sec. 6662(b)(3), (e), and (h), and we did not           
          make any conclusions as to the value of the expropriated                    
          properties.  See supra note 5.                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011