Cynthia J. Hall - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               On May 19, 2003, petitioner filed a response to respondent’s           
          motion for summary judgment.                                                
               On June 24, 2003, the Court filed intervenor’s reply to                
          petitioner’s response to respondent’s motion and intervenor’s               
          response to respondent’s motion for summary judgment.                       
               On September 2, 2003, petitioner filed a response to                   
          intervenor’s reply to petitioner’s response to motion for summary           
          judgment.                                                                   
               As of the date of the hearing, the outstanding balance on              
          the 1995 tax liability was $859.                                            
          Discussion                                                                  
               An election pursuant to section 6015(b), (c), or (f) must be           
          made within 2 years of the Commissioner’s first collection                  
          activity taken after July 22, 1998, against the taxpayer making             
          the election.  Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform            
          Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3201(g)(2), 112 Stat. 740;               
          sec. 6015(b)(1)(E) and (c)(3)(B); Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 5,               
          2000-1 C.B. 447, 449.3  The offset of an overpayment is a                   
          collection activity  pursuant to section 6015.  Campbell v.                 
          Commissioner, 121 T.C. 290, 292 (2003); see also secs. 1.6015-              
          5(b)(2)(i), 1.6015-9, Income Tax Regs. (defining an offset of an            
          overpayment against a liability pursuant to section 6402 as a               

               3  We note that petitioner does not question the validity of           
          Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447; therefore, we need not                 
          address the validity of the Revenue Procedure.                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011