- 12 - collaterally estop a taxpayer from denying that he acted fraudulently for purposes of section 6653(b), it does constitute persuasive evidence of fraud. See Morse v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-332; Parsons v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-205; Biaggi v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-48, affd. 8 Fed. Appx. 66 (2d Cir. 2001). Further, absent credible evidence showing that the willful filing of the false tax return was done for a purpose other than defrauding the Government of taxes owed, the conviction under section 7206(1) is highly persuasive evidence that fraud was committed. Mr. Hamilton failed to proffer any evidence demonstrating that his willful filing of a false tax return for 1988 was done for any reason other than evading Federal income taxes owed for that year. Accordingly, this constitutes highly persuasive evidence that Mr. Hamilton acted fraudulently. Thus, upon consideration of the entire record, we find that respondent has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Hamilton acted with the requisite fraudulent intent, and that the entire understatement of income for 1988 is due to fraud. We therefore sustain respondent’s determination that Mr. Hamilton is liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b). C. Whether Petitioners Are Liable for Additions to Tax for Their Substantial Understatement of Tax for 1988 Section 6661(a) provides for a 25-percent addition to tax for the substantial understatement of income tax. An “understatement” is defined as the excess of the tax required toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011