Gary D. and Johnean F. Hansen - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               affiliate of the Partnership preparing all personal and                
               Partnership returns and controlling all audit activity with            
               the Internal Revenue Service. * * * Then, all Partners are             
               able to benefit from the concept of “Circle the Wagons,” and           
               no individual Partner can be isolated and have his tax                 
               losses disallowed because of the incompetence or lack of               
               knowledge of a tax preparer who is not familiar with the               
               law, regulations, format, procedures, and operations                   
               concerning the Partnership that are required to protect the            
               Limited Partners from Internal Revenue audits. * * * If a              
               Partner needs more or less Partnership loss any year, it is            
               arranged quickly within the office, without the Partner                
               having to pay a higher fee while an outside preparer spends            
               more time to make the arrangements.                                    
          Finally, the document warned that there remained a chance that “A           
          change in tax law or an audit and disallowance by the IRS could             
          take away all or part of the tax benefits, plus the possibility             
          of having to pay back the tax savings, with penalties and                   
          interest.”                                                                  
               At the time that she initially made the investment in 1986,            
          and through the year in issue, Ms. Hansen believed that she owned           
          cattle through the investment and that the investment would                 
          produce a profit and provide retirement income.1  She also                  
          believed the Hoyt promotional materials insofar as they stated              
          that Congress passed tax laws intending to promote the                      
          subsidization of the cattle industry and that investing in a Hoyt           
          partnership was therefore “socially desirable”.  Before investing           
          in the Hoyt partnerships, petitioners did not consult with anyone           

          1Because Mr. Hansen did not testify at trial, there is no                   
          evidence in the record with respect to his understanding of the             
          nature of the Hoyt investment.                                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011