Carolyn Ann Harris - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          of Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters”, provided            
          by respondent, which fails to reflect the filing of a return by             
          petitioner in April 1998.  We do not find this document, standing           
          alone, to be sufficient to rebut the presumption of delivery in             
          the presence of unchallenged evidence of mailing.  Consequently,            
          we find that respondent received petitioner’s return in April               
          1998, and that the return was filed at that time.  Because                  
          petitioner filed her return in April 1998, and the notice of                
          deficiency was issued in November 2002, the assessment and                  
          collection of the deficiency determined therein is statutorily              
          barred.  See sec. 6501(a).                                                  
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for petitioner.                               





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011