Leslie M. Hiltz - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          proceeding, the bankruptcy court discharged Carole’s 1987 tax               
          liability.                                                                  
          C.   Notice of Federal Tax Lien                                             
               On September 8, 2000, respondent mailed to petitioner and              
          Carole a Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a              
          Hearing Under I.R.C. � 6320 regarding the 1987 tax liability.               
          D.   Appeals Office Hearings                                                
               On September 25, 2000, petitioner and Carole timely filed a            
          Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing.  On               
          January 25 and March 19, 2002, petitioner met with Appeals                  
          Officer Ronald Szalkowski (AO Szalkowski) and discussed the 1987            
          tax liability and the possibility of entering into an installment           
          agreement.  AO Szalkowski subsequently prepared an installment              
          agreement and forwarded it to petitioner, who rejected it because           
          it reflected a greater balance due than he had anticipated.                 
          E.   Notice of Determination                                                
               In a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s)           
          Under Section 6320 and/or 6330, dated August 16, 2002, respondent           
          determined that the legal, administrative, and procedural                   
          requirements for proceeding with collection by lien of                      
          petitioner’s and Carole’s 1987 income tax had been met.                     
               On September 17, 2002, petitioner and Carole timely filed a            
          petition in this Court.  Respondent moved to dismiss this case as           
          to Carole because her underlying tax liability had been                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011