Tim W. Holliday - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          issue for decision is whether respondent may proceed with the               
          proposed levy.  We hold that he may.                                        
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner was a resident of American Canyon, California,              
          when his petition was filed.                                                
               Petitioner timely filed a 1992 individual Federal income tax           
          return reporting tax due of $716.  After correcting the return              
          for computational and clerical errors, respondent assessed the              
          tax due thereon of $1,061 on June 7, 1993.                                  
               Petitioner did not timely file a Federal income tax return             
          for 1993 or 1995.  On October 6, 1997, respondent prepared a                
          substitute for return for each year, and on May 18, 1998,                   
          respondent assessed tax of $2,903 for 1993 and $6,138 for 1995.2            
          Petitioner filed 1993 and 1995 individual Federal income tax                
          returns on September 21 and 18, 1998, respectively.  Respondent             
          subsequently abated the assessment for each year to reflect the             
          tax reported on petitioner's returns after correcting for                   
          computational and clerical errors.                                          
               Petitioner filed a 1994 individual Federal income tax return           
          on September 21, 1998; an assessment of $2,974 was made with                
          respect to that return.                                                     




               2 Respondent concedes that notices of deficiency for these             
          years were not received by petitioner.                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011