John William Hollis - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          signed the joint tax return for 1999 and mailed it to intervenor            
          with the four Forms W-2.  Intervenor signed the return.                     
               Petitioner and intervenor correctly reported their adjusted            
          gross income of $98,484.04 on their 1999 joint return, and they             
          attached all four of their Forms W-2 for 1999.  Those Forms W-2             
          show that Federal income tax totaling $15,872.07 had been                   
          withheld from petitioner and intervenor in 1999.  However,                  
          petitioner and intervenor reported on their 1999 return that                
          $17,872.07 had been withheld, and that they were due a refund of            
          $1,211.07.  They asked that the refund be directly deposited in             
          petitioner’s bank account.  Petitioner and intervenor had agreed            
          that petitioner would receive two-thirds of the refund and                  
          intervenor would receive one-third.                                         
               Petitioner and intervenor received a $1,491 refund for                 
          1999.4  The refund was deposited in petitioner’s bank account               
          around May 20, 2000.  Intervenor received no benefit from the               
          refund.  Respondent later discovered that petitioner and                    
          intervenor had overstated their withholding and notified them               
          that they owed income tax and interest for 1999.                            
          C.   Petitioner’s Request for Relief From Joint Liability                   
               On September 10, 2001, petitioner filed Form 8857, Request             
          for Innocent Spouse Relief, seeking relief from joint liability             

               4  The parties do not explain the difference in the amount             
          of the refund claimed for 1999 and the amount that respondent               
          paid.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011