Elmer J. Hopson - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          We sustain respondent’s determination in the notice of                      
          deficiency.                                                                 
               The second issue for decision is whether petitioner is (a)             
          entitled to deductions in addition to those claimed on his                  
          return, and/or (b) entitled to recharacterize as business expense           
          deductions any of the itemized deductions that he claimed on his            
          return.2  Petitioner argues that he is entitled to the changes              
          which he made to his filed return on a Form 1040X, Amended U.S.             
          Individual Tax Return.  Petitioner submitted this form to the IRS           
          in April 2003, following the issuance of the notice of deficiency           
          underlying this case.  On the form, petitioner claimed a variety            
          of changes to the information on his original return.  First, he            
          added a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, on which he               
          claimed zero gross income and a loss of $28,379 for a business              
          named “Maritime Ventures” engaged in the business of “Antique               
          Dealer”.  Petitioner also decreased his claimed itemized                    
          deductions by $11,328 to $45,203, due in whole or part to his               
          recharacterization of certain expenses--which he claimed on his             
          original return as itemized deductions--as business expenses on             
          the Schedule C.  Respondent has not accepted any amounts reported           
          by petitioner on the amended return.                                        




          2The recharacterization of itemized deductions as business                  
          expense deductions would change petitioner’s AMT liability under            
          sec. 55(a).                                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011