- 10 - used, he said it was for writing "bills", writing proposals, and investigating new techniques. Upon further questioning he stated that there were no proposals written for the year and that the office was used mainly for writing "bills" and for "personal e- mail to send bills" rather than to mail them. Petitioner also testified that he used his garage as a storage facility for his "business items". He presented pictures of the interior and exterior of his garage. The pictures of the interior show a mixture of items that could be used for petitioner's trade or business or for personal purposes. The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that petitioner used his dining room and his garage only occasionally and not exclusively or on a regular basis as the principal place of business for his trade or business. Deductions for Business Transportation Expenses and Computer Expenses Where a taxpayer has established that he has incurred a trade or business expense, failure to prove the exact amount of the otherwise deductible item may not be fatal. Generally, unless precluded by section 274, the Court may estimate the amount of such an expense and allow the deduction to that extent. See Finley v. Commissioner, 255 F.2d 128, 133 (10th Cir. 1958), affg. 27 T.C. 413 (1956); Cohan v. Commissioner, supra. Certain business deductions described in section 274, however, are subject to rules of substantiation that supersede the doctrine inPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011