Jerry Howard-Crowley - Page 11

                                        - 10 -                                        
          used, he said it was for writing "bills", writing proposals, and            
          investigating new techniques.  Upon further questioning he stated           
          that there were no proposals written for the year and that the              
          office was used mainly for writing "bills" and for "personal e-             
          mail to send bills" rather than to mail them.                               
               Petitioner also testified that he used his garage as a                 
          storage facility for his "business items".  He presented pictures           
          of the interior and exterior of his garage.  The pictures of the            
          interior show a mixture of items that could be used for                     
          petitioner's trade or business or for personal purposes.                    
               The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that                
          petitioner used his dining room and his garage only occasionally            
          and not exclusively or on a regular basis as the principal place            
          of business for his trade or business.                                      
               Deductions for Business Transportation Expenses                        
               and Computer Expenses                                                  
               Where a taxpayer has established that he has incurred a                
          trade or business expense, failure to prove the exact amount of             
          the otherwise deductible item may not be fatal.  Generally,                 
          unless precluded by section 274, the Court may estimate the                 
          amount of such an expense and allow the deduction to that extent.           
          See Finley v. Commissioner, 255 F.2d 128, 133 (10th Cir. 1958),             
          affg. 27 T.C. 413 (1956); Cohan v. Commissioner, supra.  Certain            
          business deductions described in section 274, however, are                  
          subject to rules of substantiation that supersede the doctrine in           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011