IPO II, A Partnership, Gerald R. Forsythe, Tax Matters Partner - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                    Held:  All of the liability is allocable to F                     
               because IO cannot be related to F or to IE for purposes                
               of determining the allocation of the recourse liability                
               pursuant to sec. 1.752-4(b)(2)(iii), Income Tax Regs.                  


               David J. Duez, Thomas C. Borders, and Ann M. Chavie, for               
          petitioner.                                                                 
               Jason W. Anderson, for respondent.                                     


                                       OPINION                                        

               HAINES, Judge:  Respondent issued a notice of final                    
          partnership administrative adjustment (FPAA) to Gerald R.                   
          Forsythe, as tax matters partner (TMP) for IPO II, determining              
          adjustments to IPO II’s Federal tax returns for 1998 and 1999               
          (years in issue).  For clarification purposes, we shall refer to            
          Gerald R. Forsythe in his capacity as TMP as petitioner; we shall           
          refer to Gerald R. Forsythe in his capacity as owner of IPO II              
          and the other entities described below as Mr. Forsythe.                     
               After concessions,1 the issue for decision is whether any of           
          the recourse liability incurred by IPO II with respect to the               

               1  The parties provided the following stipulations:  (1)               
          IPO II is not entitled to claim a deduction for salaries and                
          wages of $104,000 for each of the years in issue; and (2)                   
          respondent concedes that IPO II correctly reported the principal            
          business activity as “Chartering Airplane”, the principal product           
          or service as “Chartering Airplane”, the Business Code number,              
          and the loss from said activity as an ordinary loss from trade or           
          business activities.  As a result, respondent conceded that IPO             
          II correctly reported ordinary losses from said activity of                 
          $1,385,457 in 1998 and $752,824 in 1999.                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011