Larry R. Johnston - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          Stated otherwise, cases will not be remanded to Appeals, nor                
          determinations otherwise invalidated, merely on account of the              
          lack of a recording when to do so is not necessary and would not            
          be productive.  See, e.g., Frey v. Commissioner, supra;                     
          Durrenberger v. Commissioner, supra; Brashear v. Commissioner,              
          supra; Kemper v. Commissioner, supra; see also Lunsford v.                  
          Commissioner, 117 T.C. 183, 189 (2001).                                     
               A principal scenario falling short of the necessary or                 
          productive standard exists where the taxpayers rely on frivolous            
          or groundless arguments consistently rejected by this and other             
          courts.  See, e.g., Frey v. Commissioner, supra; Brashear v.                
          Commissioner, supra; Kemper v. Commissioner, supra.  Here,                  
          because the contentions advanced by petitioner throughout the               
          administrative process and before the Court are of this nature,             
          and because petitioner in fact received an in-person conference,            
          this case is closely analogous to those just cited.  The record             
          does not indicate that any purpose would be served by remand.  We           
          conclude that all pertinent issues relating to the propriety of             
          the collection determination can be decided through review of the           
          materials before us.                                                        
                    2.  Review of Underlying Liabilities                              
               Statutory notices of deficiency for 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,            
          and 1997 were issued to petitioner.  Petitioner has at no time              
          alleged that he did not receive these notices, and the record               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011