Scott William Katz - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          amount of this deficiency is alternative minimum tax, under                 
          section 55.2                                                                
               The issue for decision in both parties’ motions is whether             
          the alternative minimum tax applies to petitioner.3                         
               Our statements as to the facts are based entirely on those             
          matters that are admitted in the pleadings, those matters that              
          are admitted in the motion papers, those matters set forth in               
          affidavits or declarations submitted by the parties, and those              
          matters stated and not rebutted in the Court’s hearing on the               
          motions.                                                                    
                                     Background                                       
               When the petition was filed in the instant case, petitioner            
          resided in West Palm Beach, Florida.                                        
               On petitioner’s 2000 tax return, he claimed the status of              
          married filing separately.  On this tax return, petitioner showed           
          adjusted gross income of $46,834.16, itemized deductions of                 
          $54,275.81, and personal exemptions of $2,800.  Petitioner                  
          computed his taxable income as zero, and his tax liability as               
          zero.  He showed $133.66 as withheld income tax, all of which he            




               2  Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are to           
          sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect for              
          the year in issue.                                                          
               3  At the hearing, petitioner stated that he does not                  
          contest the correctness of respondent’s “numbers”.                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011