Robert B. Kemp, Jr. - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          did not address on brief) the remaining amount of underreported             
          income.                                                                     
               The typical indicia of an intent to evade tax are not                  
          present.  Petitioner maintained adequate records, made all                  
          pertinent information available to the Internal Revenue Service,            
          and cooperated with the Internal Revenue Service’s investigation.           
          In short, petitioner understated his income, but respondent has             
          not established that petitioner intended to evade tax.                      
          Accordingly, we reject respondent’s determinations.                         
               Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or             
          meritless.                                                                  
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              


                                                  Decisions will be entered           
                                             for petitioner.                          





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011