Della H. Knorr and Duane J. Knorr - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          6015(b) or (c) is premised on the existence of a deficiency for             
          the year for which relief is sought.  Sec. 6015(b)(1)(D), (c)(1);           
          see H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 252-254 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747,             
          1006-1008.  Consequently, if there is no deficiency for the year            
          for which relief is sought, relief from joint and several                   
          liability is not available under either subsection.  See                    
          Washington v. Commissioner, 120 T.C. 137, 146-147 (2003); see               
          also Hopkins v. Commissioner, 121 T.C. 73, 88 (2003); Block v.              
          Commissioner, 120 T.C. 62, 65-66 (2003); Ewing v. Commissioner,             
          118 T.C. 494, 497, 498 n.4 (2002); cf. sec. 6015(e)(1).  In this            
          case, petitioner seeks relief from additions to tax and interest            
          that respondent determined with respect to the tax liabilities              
          reported on the joint income tax returns for 1990 through 1995              
          rather than from deficiencies for those years.  Accordingly, no             
          relief is available to petitioner under section 6015(b) or (c).             
               If relief is not available under either section 6015(b) or             
          (c), an individual may seek equitable relief under section                  
          6015(f).  Sec. 6015(f)(2).  Section 6015(f) permits relief from             
          joint and several liability where “it is inequitable to hold the            
          individual liable for any unpaid tax or any deficiency (or any              
          portion of either)”.  Sec. 6015(f)(1).  Equitable relief under              
          section 6015(f) is granted at the Commissioner’s discretion.                
               We review the Commissioner’s determination to deny equitable           
          relief under section 6015(f) using an abuse of discretion                   






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011