Albert M. Kun - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               In addition to Form 656, Offer in Compromise, petitioner               
          submitted the following completed forms at the hearing:  (1) Form           
          433-A, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and                
          Self-Employed Individuals, and (2) Form 433-B, Collection                   
          Information Statement for Businesses.  On the Form 433-A,                   
          petitioner indicated that he was an unmarried, self-employed                
          attorney and had total monthly income and expenses of $2,707 and            
          $3,302, respectively.  On the Form 433-B, petitioner stated that            
          he had total monthly business income and expenses of $6,131 and             
          $3,424, respectively.                                                       
               On October 11, 2002, the Appeals Office sent to petitioner a           
          Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under               
          Section 6320 and/or 6330 (notice of determination).  In the                 
          notice of determination, the Appeals Office determined the                  
          following:                                                                  
               1.  All legal and procedural requirements for filing the               
          notice of Federal tax lien had been met.                                    
               2.  Petitioner’s income tax liabilities were timely                    
          assessed, and the assessments were “properly based on established           
          law, policy and procedure.”                                                 
               3.  Petitioner’s offer-in-compromise was properly rejected,            
          because petitioner was noncompliant in the payment of both his              
          income tax liabilities and estimated tax payments, petitioner was           
          capable of paying more than the amount offered, no exceptional              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011