- 2 - petitioner’s unpaid Federal income taxes for 1997. The issues for our consideration are: (1) Whether petitioner was granted an opportunity for a hearing within the meaning of section 6330; and (2) whether respondent’s determination to proceed with the proposed collection activity was an abuse of discretion. A trial was held at San Francisco, California, and petitioner provided testimony and argument. FINDINGS OF FACT2 Petitioner resided in Sacramento, California, at the time he filed the petition in this case. Petitioner filed his 1997 Federal income tax return on October 2, 1998. On the return, petitioner claimed an overpayment of $6,104. Respondent applied the claimed overpayment to petitioner’s unpaid tax liability for 1987. Respondent later discovered that petitioner had failed to report $6,022 of interest income for 1997. On February 9, 2000, respondent mailed a statutory notice of deficiency to petitioner with respect to his 1997 tax year. In the notice, respondent determined a $2,198 income tax deficiency and a $220 addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1). Petitioner received the notice but did not file a petition with this Court to contest respondent’s deficiency determination. Respondent assessed the additional tax, penalty and interest on July 10, 2000. 2 The parties’ stipulation of facts is incorporated by this reference.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011