- 7 - interest was not transferred on January 12, 1989. In fact, on that date the parties had not yet decided which option would be exercised. There is insufficient evidence to alter our construction of the unambiguous terms of the agreement. In the alternative, petitioner contends that he did not receive any distributions after January 12, 1989, and, therefore, any allocation to him of partnership income accrued after that date lacks substantial economic effect. We disagree. The substantial economic effect requirement involves a two- part analysis: the allocation must be found to have economic effect, and such economic effect must be substantial. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs. In order for an allocation to have economic effect, it must be consistent with the underlying economic arrangement of the partners. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs. Although the partnership did not make any actual distributions to petitioner, Smith, or Fowler in 1989 and 1990, its income was used to make payments relating to the $20 million loan. Pursuant to section 752(b), the partnership is deemed to have made distributions to all partners liable for such loan. Sec. 752(b); sec. 1.702-1(a), Income Tax Regs.; United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441, 453 (1973). In 1989, all of the partners were liable for the loan, and petitioner was liable for the loan until at least April of 1990. Thus, in 1989 and 1990 petitioner received an economic benefit consistent with thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011