Gary T. Mackey - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Commissioner, 98 T.C. 695, 700 (1992).  We have previously denied           
          estoppel claims of taxpayers based on erroneous abatements or               
          refunds.  See, e.g., Miller v. Commissioner, 23 T.C. 565, 569               
          (1954), affd. 231 F.2d 8 (5th Cir. 1956); Brown v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1996-100, affd. without published opinion 181 F.3d 99            
          (6th Cir. 1999); Wilson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-491;               
          Beer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-735, affd. 733 F.2d 435               
          (6th Cir. 1984).                                                            
               Although we deem it unnecessary to provide an indepth                  
          analysis of the doctrine of equitable estoppel here, we do note             
          that one of the key elements of an estoppel claim is reasonable             
          reliance on the acts or statements in question.  Greenberg Bros.            
          Pship. #4 v. Commissioner, 111 T.C. 198, 208 n.16 (1998), affd.             
          sub nom. Cinema ‘84 v. Commissioner, 294 F.3d 432 (2d Cir. 2002).           
          Given the fact that: (1) The aggregate deficiencies and additions           
          to tax determined in the notices exceeded petitioner’s                      
          corresponding remittances by more than $110,000, (2) respondent’s           
          counsel had previously notified petitioner that assessments had             
          been made in error and that corrective action would follow to               
          restore the status quo, and (3) petitioner received no indication           
          from either respondent’s counsel or this Court that his case had            
          been resolved, we conclude that petitioner’s reliance on the                
          erroneous refund and contemporaneous correspondence from                    








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011