- 14 - during the investigation. Additionally, petitioner did not conduct his dealings with CNC in cash. These factors might mitigate against a finding of fraud were it not for the more compelling factors establishing fraud outlined above. Therefore, we conclude that respondent has clearly and convincingly proven that at least some portion of the underpayment of tax for the 1992 and 1993 tax years was due to fraud. Most revealing in this regard are the admissions petitioner made during his plea hearing. Petitioner has not introduced cogent evidence to support his claim that the entire underpayment is not attributable to fraud. Therefore, we sustain respondent’s determination that petitioner is liable for penalties for fraud under section 6663 for the 1992 and 1993 tax years. III. Conclusion Based on the foregoing, we hold that petitioner is liable for penalties for fraud under section 6663 for the years at issue. Because section 6663 applies, we need not address respondent’s alternative argument under section 6662(a).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011