Ray E. Mason - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               The Masons consistently filed timely income tax returns for            
          almost 40 years, then stopped in 1987.  They did not file their             
          income tax return for 1987 until May 1991 and did not file                  
          another income tax return after that until October 1997 when they           
          filed an income tax return for 1996.  They did not file timely              
          income tax returns for 1988 through 1995 despite having                     
          significant taxable income in each of these years.  When the                
          Masons eventually filed these income tax returns, they reported             
          adjusted gross income of $107,336 in 1993, $148,221 in 1994, and            
          $97,064 in 1995.                                                            
               The Masons did not file their income tax return for 1995               
          until 3 years after it was due, and then only after respondent              
          initiated a criminal investigation for the Masons’ failure to               
          file.  Petitioner pleaded guilty in May 2000 to willfully failing           
          to file a Federal income tax return for 1995 under section 7203.            
               Respondent determined a deficiency and a fraudulent failure            
          to file addition to tax under section 6651(f) for 1995.                     
          Petitioner timely filed a petition with this Court for a                    
          redetermination.  The parties stipulated that there is a                    
          deficiency in income tax for 1995 of $2,859.5  The only issue we            
          have to decide is whether petitioner’s failure to file an income            
          tax return for 1995 was fraudulent.                                         

               5Because the stipulated deficiency amount is different from            
          the deficiency amount in the statutory notice, a Rule 155                   
          computation must be done.                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011