William Robertson McSkimming III - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Therefore, that prior order shall continue, and upon                   
               Mr. Cinelli’s report back to the Court, we will then                   
               hopefully come to an agreement on the amount of child                  
               support to be paid, or, if not, we will, of course, set                
               it down for further proceedings to make that ultimate                  
               determination.  But we are not making that                             
               determination today.                                                   
                     *      *      *      *      *      *      *                      
                    THE REFEREE:  * * * It would seem to me that once                 
               that visitation schedule has been set, it is simply a                  
               matter of calculation between yourselves and your                      
               attorneys as to how to then prorate the amount of                      
               support that’s going to be paid and how to break out of                
               the present unallocated support, the figure of support                 
               and maintenance.  Therefore, you shouldn’t have to                     
               appear in front of the Court so long as there is                       
               cooperation with Mr. Cinelli with regard to setting                    
               forth some reasonable visitation. * * *                                
               There was no further proceeding to fix a specific amount as            
          to child support.                                                           
               Ms. McSkimming had remarried by 2000.1  Petitioner                     
          nevertheless paid Ms. McSkimming $400 per week during 2000, for a           
          total sum of $20,800.2                                                      
               During the year in issue, petitioner and Ms. McSkimming had            
          joint custody of their three children.  Ms. McSkimming had                  
          physical custody, while petitioner had the right to reasonable              
          and liberal visitation.                                                     

               1  Petitioner is uncertain of the year when Ms. McSkimming             
          remarried, believing that her remarriage occurred sometime from             
          1996 to 1998.                                                               
               2  The record indicates that Ms. McSkimming did not include,           
          in her Federal income tax return for the 2000 taxable year, any             
          portion of this amount as gross income under secs. 61(a)(8) and             
          71(a).                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011