Marty J. Meehan - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          Petitioner’s 1996-99 Tax Liabilities                                        
               Petitioner failed to file timely Federal income tax returns            
          for 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.  These returns have since been              
          filed.  On December 1, 2000, respondent made assessments against            
          petitioner for taxable years 1996, 1997, and 1999, apparently on            
          the basis of amounts shown as tax on petitioner’s late-filed                
          returns.  On December 8, 2000, respondent sent petitioner a                 
          Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing               
          Under I.R.C. � 6320, relating to petitioner’s 1996, 1997, and               
          1999 income tax liabilities.  On December 12, 2000, respondent              
          sent petitioner a Final Notice, Notice of Intent to Levy, and               
          Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, relating to petitioner’s 1996,           
          1997, and 1999 income tax liabilities.  On or about December 29,            
          2000, in response to these notices, petitioner filed a timely               
          Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing,                   
          challenging the legality of the continuing wage levy and raising            
          issues relating to financial hardship.                                      
          Notice of Determination                                                     
               On November 27, 2001, after a hearing, respondent’s Appeals            
          Office issued petitioner a notice of determination sustaining the           
          notice of Federal tax lien filing for petitioner’s 1996, 1997,              
          and 1999 income tax liabilities but determining that petitioner’s           


               4(...continued)                                                        
          failed to establish that the levy had caused a hardship.                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011