- 5 - for his children for more than half the taxable year. Sec. 2(b)(1). On the basis of all the evidence, we conclude that petitioner did not maintain a home that served as the principal place of abode for the children for any part of 2001. We sustain respondent’s determination that petitioner’s proper filing status for 2001 is single.2 Decision will be entered for respondent. 2 Respondent has not raised and we do not consider any issue as to whether petitioner’s proper filing status for 2001 should be married filing separately.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: May 25, 2011