- 8 - $55,000 as alimony, “lump sum.” Hence, under Georgia law, petitioner’s obligation to pay the $55,000 would not have terminated upon his former wife’s death prior to his making actual payment to her on August 1, 2000. Winokur v. Winokur, supra at 94-96; cf. Bisno v. Bisno, 236 S.E.2d 755 (Ga. 1977) (divorce agreement construed to provide for payment of terminable periodic alimony to wife where parties therein stated those alimony payments were intended to be deductible by the husband for Federal income tax purposes and where payments would otherwise not qualify to be deducted if husband’s obligation to make those payments was nonterminable). Accordingly, we hold that the $55,000 lump-sum payment petitioner made to his former wife does not qualify to be deducted as alimony paid by him under section 215. Sec. 71(b)(1)(D); Preston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-49, affd. on this issue 209 F.3d 1281, 1285 (11th Cir. 2000); see also Human v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-65. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011