George Ira Nicol - Page 11

                                       - 10 -                                         
               An offer in compromise must be submitted on special forms              
          prescribed by the Secretary.  Laurins v. Commissioner, supra at             
          912; Riederich v. Commissioner, 985 F.2d 574 (9th Cir. 1993),               
          affg. without published opinion T.C. Memo. 1991-164.  Section               
          601.203(b), Statement of Procedural Rules, identifies Form 656 as           
          the form required for an offer in compromise.  Petitioner                   
          admittedly did not submit a Form 656 or otherwise describe his              
          income, assets, and other financial information required by Form            
          656 to respondent.                                                          
               b.  Installment Agreement                                              
               The Court assumes, arguendo that petitioner intended that              
          his offer to make monthly payments would be treated by respondent           
          as an installment agreement.  An installment agreement                      
          contemplates payment in full of an amount acknowledged as owed              
          and is based on the taxpayer's current financial condition.  See            
          sec. 6159; sec. 301.6159-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs.; 2                       
          Administration, Internal Revenue Manual (CCH), sec. 5.19.1.5.4.1            
          at 18,299-65; Form 433-D, Installment Agreement; see also Crisan            
          v. Commissioner, supra; Martin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-            
          288.                                                                        
               Respondent's determination was based on information provided           
          by petitioner and Mrs. Nicol to the Appeals officer which                   
          reflected petitioner's and Mrs. Nicol's current financial                   
          condition.  See Crisan v. Commissioner, supra; Schulman v.                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011