Tobias G. Ogu - Page 28

                                       - 27 -                                         
          petitioner does not qualify for head of household filing status.            
          Id.  Respondent’s determination is therefore sustained.                     
               D.  Issue 3.  Earned Income Credit                                     
               On each of his returns for 1999 and 2000, petitioner claimed           
          an earned income credit identifying his son Chinedu N. Ogu as a             
          qualifying child.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent                  
          disallowed the earned income credit for both years.  Respondent             
          based the disallowance on the lack of a qualifying child and on             
          the fact that petitioner’s income exceeded the maximum amount               
          allowable to claim an earned income credit without regard to a              
          qualifying child.                                                           
               In the case of an eligible individual, section 32(a) allows            
          an earned income credit against the individual’s income tax                 
          liability.  As relevant in the first instance, an “eligible                 
          individual” is defined as an individual who has a “qualifying               
          child” for the taxable year.  Sec. 32(c)(1)(A)(i).                          
               As required by section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii), and as relevant                
          herein, a “qualifying child” is the taxpayer’s son who has the              
          same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than half            
          of the taxable year.                                                        
               During each of the taxable years in issue, petitioner’s son            
          lived with his mother for more than half of the year.  See supra            
          note 18.  As stated above, this living arrangement was consistent           
          with the divorce decree granting petitioner’s former spouse the             






Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011